Seeing through Theology's Demise

Video: [link]

Theologians

Goes into an analysis of a recent Metatron video .... (highlights here).

Highlights:

• False Claims:
  • "interpretation of Koine Greek terms is not the same thing as Classical Greek"
  • "you're trained to read but not trained to interpret"
  • "Bible stuff is to be interpreted by itself and cannot have insight from classical texts"
  • character assassinations (is a bully, likes control, is stupid) - not evidence for anything.
  • appeal to authority - no one would translate it this way (shows english translation of Mark 51-52 for "proof" how it doesn't say those things Ammon shows us is in the Greek)

• Conclusions:
  • Film flammer
  • 30,000 bits of evidence for christing/χριω, 2/3s of that happens later in CE, so that's still a lot from BCE.
  • They try to isolate the monism so that it can be the authority. But this doesn't hold up. No text is isolated like this.
  • Lucian is using these same terms, 1000's of times, and writing about Lestes
  • Koine is same as classical Greek, not something different
  • Mark 14-51 Translation from Source
  • they believe you must fall back to interpretation, criticism that Ammon is "not trained to interpret" - back alley, and his finger is somewhere
  • same old rehash fake criticisms from theologians
  • must read homer, lucian, contemporaries of Jesus writing at that same time.
  • dont rely on the english translation, it's not proof of anything except derivative translation (bad translation ancestor of an ancestor = lost in translation)